RETRIEVAL · EVALUATION
>>> Agentic ASO
RETRIEVAL · EVALUATION
>>> Agentic ASO
AI DISCOVERY · ACTION
>>> Chosen by AI agents.
Discovered, evaluated, and transacted, not just recommended.
BRAND · SENTIMENT
>>> AI brand beliefs
Favorable
Unfavorable
SHORTLIST · PICKS
>>> Agent selection rate
Shortlist picks over time
READINESS · SCORE
>>> Belief audit
Agent readiness
Agents do not only pick the top search result. Selection often comes from deeper in the list.
Most evaluations lean on prior brand beliefs, not only current SERP position.
If an agent cannot complete the action, it often switches to a competitor.
Agents search the web and AI platforms, build shortlists, and lean on existing brand beliefs. We strengthen comparison content, PR, research, and authority signals so you enter the candidate set.
Agents score fit against hard requirements, nice-to-haves, and optional criteria. We build suitability pages covering who you are for, who you are not for, proof, and honest not-a-fit sections that increase trust.
Agents must complete the transaction. We implement structured product feeds, APIs, machine-readable forms, and checkout flows so agents convert instead of bouncing to a rival.

Agentic Search Optimization is not classic app-store keyword spreadsheets. Agents need to find you (Retrieval), believe you fit (Evaluation), and complete the action (Action). GEO recommends to humans; ASO gets chosen and transacted by AI.
Researchers ran 2,417 agentic tasks across ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, and others. The pattern is clear: suitability content will matter as much as landing pages do for SEO over the next two years.
We structure engagements around belief audits, suitability pages, and machine-actionable wiring, measured by selection rate and agent completions, not vanity rankings alone.
The core formula: be discoverable (Retrieval), define who you are for (Evaluation), and make transactions easy for AI (Action).
Agents search the web and AI platforms, then assemble a shortlist from what they find and already believe about your category. Comparison articles, original research, and authority content improve retrieval: 38.2% of picks in the study came from results ranked fourth or lower.
We audit what models believe about your brand versus competitors today: gaps, outdated positioning, and weak perceptions. Correction plans combine evidence, third-party validation, and PR citations agents can trust.
Retrieval work is continuous. After major positioning shifts, beliefs need refreshing so you stay in the shortlist before evaluation even starts.
Agents search the web and AI platforms, then assemble possible vendors from what they find and already believe.
Once you are on the shortlist, agents sort requirements into must-haves, important, nice-to-have, and optional, then pick the best overall fit. Clear use cases, industries, customer types, and problems solved led to 2.7× more selections in the study.
Suitability pages are structured for agent scoring: who it is for, who it is not for, hard versus nice-to-have capabilities, and proof agents can verify. Honest disqualifiers increase trust; vague marketing copy loses to competitors who state fit plainly.
We map features to buyer requirements, publish comparisons and case studies, and measure selection rate after suitability updates so you know what moved the needle.
Agents sort requirements into must-haves, important, nice-to-have, and optional, then pick the best overall fit.
Selection without completion is a lost sale. Machine-actionable pages completed conversions 78.3% of the time in the study; non-actionable pages dropped to 9.6%, and agents often switched to a rival who made the transaction easy.
Structured product feeds, documented APIs, machine-readable forms, and frictionless checkout are required, not optional extras you add after launch. We wire the paths agents need so purchase, booking, or signup happens without a human in the loop.
Action readiness is tested end to end: feeds published, endpoints documented, checkout completable programmatically, and completion rate monitored against shortlist inclusion.
Machine-actionable pages completed conversions 78.3% of the time. Non-actionable pages dropped to 9.6%, and agents often switched vendors.
The study across major AI platforms shows agents do not only choose the top search result. Deep retrieval and prior brand beliefs shape outcomes as much as position: 81.6% of evaluations start from what models already think about vendors.
Reputation and third-party validation matter more because agents lean on prior opinions before they ever hit your site. Future success is measured by how often AI chooses and acts on you, not traditional rankings alone.
Our reporting covers shortlist inclusion, selection rate, belief-audit deltas versus competitors, suitability coverage gaps, and action completion after APIs and feeds are wired, so you have a roadmap, not a one-off audit deck.
Agents do not only choose the top result. Deep retrieval and brand beliefs shape outcomes as much as position.